• → European Space Agency

    • About Science & Technology

    • For Public

    • For Educators

    • ESA

    • Science & Technology

    • SRE-FI

    • Missions
    • Show All Missions
    • Future Missions Preparation Office
    • Introduction to the Office
    • Astrophysics and Fundamental Physics Missions
    • Planetary and Solar System Exploration Studies
    • Advanced Technologies
    • Science Payload Instruments
    • Active Instruments
    • MIDAS
    • MIP
    • OSIRIS
    • HASI
    • SOHO-VIRGO-LOI
    • Solar Electron Proton Telescope (SEPT)
    • Flight Instrumentation In Development
    • Instrument Research and Development
    • Microcam
    • Laser Mass Spectrometer
    • Optical Ground Station
    • S-Cam 2
    • S-Cam 3
    • S-Cam 4
    • Instrument Technology R&D
    • Active Pixel Sensor
    • STJ Detectors
    • Optical DROIDS
    • X-ray DROIDS
    • Technology Reference Studies
    • Resources
    • Multimedia Gallery
    • Publications Archive
    • Calendar of Events
    • Services
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Bookmark and Share

    S-Cam 2

    The STJ Detector Array

    The S-Cam 2 detector array was read-out by means of 36 Charge Sensitive Preamplifiers, one for each pixel, and a related shaping stage, all taking place at room temperature. The amplitude and risetime of the detected pulse corresponded to the total collected charge and to the decay time of the signal respectively. Noise is assessed by measuring the FWHM of the peak distribution generated by an electronic pulser.

    Figure 1: Charge spectrum obtained by a single pixel (4,4) with the array illuminated by a pulsed led (red; 630 nm) when integrated into the S-Cam 2 cryostat and undergoing system tests. The additional peaks are due to multiple (n=2 and 3) photon events.

    The integrated system test conducted prior to shipment to the William Herschel Telescope confirmed good reproducability of the electrical characteristics of the array, and also demonstrated that it was possible to operate all pixels at the same bias voltage (about 200 microvolts, typically) and with uniform responsivity. The typical pixel-to-pixel responsivity variations were at the 5 % level. As shown below, three pixels had substantially higher subgap currents than the rest of the array. The cause of this non-uniformity is not fully understood, but is suspected to be due to the IR background as seen by the individual detectors, rather than any intrinsic array defect. The larger FWHM obviously leads to a lower S/N and thus worse resolving power. Fortunately the pixels in the center of the array, where the stellar image was likely to fall, were well-behaved.

    Figure 2: 3D histograms of the subgap current at the bias voltage and of the corresponding test-pulse energy resolution for all elements of the array. Pixels (5,2), (5,3) and (5,4) show larger subgap currents and worse energy resolution.

    Introduction
    The Cryogenic Camera

    Last Update: 17 Feb 2005

    • Shortcut URL
    • http://sci.esa.int/jump.cfm?oid=33541
    • Related Articles
    • Introduction
    • The STJ Detector Array
    • The Cryogenic Camera
    • Results: Crab Pulsar
    • Results: Cataclysmic Variable
    • Results: Eclipse UZ Fornax
    • Results: Time-resolved Crab animations
    • Results: Time-sliced Crab animation
    • Results: Phase-resolved Crab animation
    • Related Links
    • Optical/UV Detectors: S-Cam 2 Documentation

    Connect with us

    • RSS
    • Youtube
    • Twitter
    • Flickr
    • Google Buzz
    • Livestream
    • Subscribe
    • App Store
    • ESA Science Twitter

    Follow ESA science

    • Copyright 2000 - 2013 © European Space Agency. All rights reserved.

    • Terms and Conditions