• → European Space Agency

    • About Science & Technology

    • For Public

    • For Educators

    • ESA

    • Science & Technology

    • Cluster

    • Missions
    • Show All Missions
    • Mission Home
    • Summary
    • Fact Sheet
    • Objectives
    • Mission Team
    • Orbit View
    • Background Science
    • Earth's Magnetic Field
    • Plasma Regions
    • Solar Wind
    • Energetic Particles
    • Space Weather
    • Science Results
    • Highlights
    • Refereed Publications
    • Spacecraft…

      • Spacecraft
      • 3D Model
      • Instruments
      • Engineering
    • Mission Operations…

      • Mission Operations
      • Launch Vehicle
      • Launch Campaign
      • Orbit/Navigation
      • Mission Timeline
      • Status Reports
    • Science Operations
    • Science Operations
    • Guest Investigator Operations
    • JSOC
    • CSDS
    • Cluster Active Archive
    • Resources
    • News Archive
    • Multimedia Gallery
    • Publication Archive
    • Calendar of Events
    • Services
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Bookmark and Share

    Predictive model of magnetosheath plasma flow and its validation against Cluster and THEMIS data

    Publication date: 12 Jun 2012

    Authors: Soucek, J. and C.P. Escoubet

    Journal: Ann. Geophys.
    Volume: 30
    Issue: 6
    Page: 973-982
    Year: 2012

    Copyright: Copernicus

    An analytical model of magnetosheath plasma flow is described and compared with a large dataset of magnetosheath ion flow velocity measurements from Cluster and THEMIS spacecraft. The model is based on previous works by Kobel and Flückiger (1994) and Génot et al. (2011) and has been modified to overcome the restrictions of these models on the shape of model magnetopause and bow shock. Our model is compatible with any parabolic bow shock model and arbitrary magnetopause model. The model is relatively simple to implement and computationally inexpensive, and its only inputs are upstream solar wind parameters. Comparison with observed data yields a good correspondence: median error in the direction of flow velocity is comparable with the instrumental error, and flow magnitude is predicted with a reasonable accuracy (relative error in flow speed was less than 25% for 86.5% of observations).

    Link to Publication

    Last Update: 11 Jul 2012

    • Shortcut URL
    • http://sci.esa.int/jump.cfm?oid=50555

    Connect with us

    • RSS
    • Youtube
    • Twitter
    • Flickr
    • Google Buzz
    • Livestream
    • Subscribe
    • App Store
    • ESA Science Twitter

    Follow ESA science

    • Copyright 2000 - 2013 © European Space Agency. All rights reserved.

    • Terms and Conditions